Political Analysis -- Table of Contents (Winter 2003, 11 [1])

Receive this page by email each issue: [Sign up for eTOCs]

Contents: Volume 11, Number 1, Winter 2003   [Index by Author]      Other Issues:

       Articles

       Replications and Extensions

Ancillary materials for articles in this issue are available

Find articles in this issue containing these words:
[Search ALL Issues]

To see an article, click its [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.

Articles:

Robert P. Berrens, Alok K. Bohara, Hank Jenkins-Smith, Carol Silva, and David L. Weimer: The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research: A Comparison of Telephone and Internet Samples
Political Analysis 2003 11: 1-22; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.1 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]

R. Michael Alvarez, Robert P. Sherman, and Carla VanBeselaere: Subject Acquisition for Web-Based Surveys
Political Analysis 2003 11: 23-43; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.23 [Abstract] [PDF] Supplementary Data [Request Permissions]

Michael C. Herron and Kenneth W. Shotts: Using Ecological Inference Point Estimates as Dependent Variables in Second-Stage Linear Regressions
Political Analysis 2003 11: 44-64; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.44 [Abstract] [PDF] Supplementary Data [Request Permissions]

Christopher Adolph and Gary King: Analyzing Second-Stage Ecological Regressions: Comment on Herron and Shotts
Political Analysis 2003 11: 65-76; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.65 [PDF] [Request Permissions]

Michael C. Herron and Kenneth W. Shotts: Cross-Contamination in EI-R: Reply
Political Analysis 2003 11: 77-85; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.77 [PDF] [Request Permissions]

Christopher Adolph, Gary King, Michael C. Herron, and Kenneth W. Shotts: A Consensus on Second-Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models
Political Analysis 2003 11: 86-94; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.86 [PDF] [Request Permissions]

Replications and Extensions:

Keith Krehbiel: The Coefficient of Party Influence
Political Analysis 2003 11: 95-103; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.95 [Abstract] [PDF] Supplementary Data [Request Permissions]

Tim Groseclose and James M. Snyder, Jr.: Interpreting the Coefficient of Party Influence: Comment on Krehbiel
Political Analysis 2003 11: 104-107; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.104 [PDF] [Request Permissions]

Keith Krehbiel: Asymmetry in Party Influence: Reply
Political Analysis 2003 11: 108-109; doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.108 [PDF] [Request Permissions]