Skip Navigation



Political Analysis Advance Access published online on June 7, 2006

Political Analysis, doi:10.1093/pan/mpj020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/3/250    most recent
mpj020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence

Andrew Bennett 1 and Colin Elman 2 *

1 Department of Government, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
2 Department of Political Science, Arizona State University, Box 873902, Tempe, AZ 85287-3902

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Colin Elman, E-mail: colin.elman{at}asu.edu


   Abstract

This article discusses the application of qualitative methods in analyzing causal complexity. In particular, the essay reviews how process tracing and systematic case comparisons can address path-dependent explanations. The article unpacks the concept of path dependence and its component elements of causal possibility, contingency, closure of alternatives, and constraints to the current path. The article then reviews four strengths that case studies bring to the study of path dependence: offering a detailed and holistic analysis of sequences in historical cases, being suitable for the study of rare events, facilitating the search for omitted variables that might lie behind contingent events, and allowing for the study of interaction effects within one or a few cases.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
C. Elmelund-Praestekaer and C. Wien
What's the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 247 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. Mahoney
Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 122 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
A. Bennett and C. Elman
Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 170 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.