Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on April 5, 2006
Political Analysis 2006 14(4):439-455; doi:10.1093/pan/mpj010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Splitting the Difference? Causal Inference and Theories of Split-party Delegations
Department of Political Science, Encina Hall West, Room 100, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Economics, 549 Evans Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 e-mail: butler{at}econ.berkeley.edu
e-mail: daniel_butler{at}stanford.edu (corresponding author)
We provide an introduction to the regression discontinuity design (RDD) and use the technique to evaluate models of sequential Senate elections predicting that the winning party for one Senate seat will receive fewer votes in the next election for the other seat. Using data on U.S. Senate elections from 1946 to 2004, we find strong evidence that the outcomes of the elections for the two Senate seats are independent.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Broockman Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design Political Analysis, October 1, 2009; 17(4): 418 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Green, T. Y. Leong, H. L. Kern, A. S. Gerber, and C. W. Larimer Testing the Accuracy of Regression Discontinuity Analysis Using Experimental Benchmarks Political Analysis, October 1, 2009; 17(4): 400 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Anderson and P. Habel Revisiting Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress, 1947-2007 Political Analysis, January 1, 2009; 17(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
