Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on June 25, 2009
Political Analysis 2009 17(3):261-275; doi:10.1093/pan/mpp005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/261    most recent
mpp005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap

Royce Carroll

Department of Political Science, MS 24, Rice University, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892

Jeffrey B. Lewis and James Lo

Department of Political Science, University of California—Los Angeles, Bunche Hall Los Angeles, CA 90095 e-mail: jameslo{at}ucla.edu (corresponding author)

Keith T. Poole

Department of Political Science, Social Sciences Building, Room 301, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0521, University of California—San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0521

Howard Rosenthal

Department of Politics, Corwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540

DW-NOMINATE scores for the U.S. Congress are widely used measures of legislators' ideological locations over time. These scores have been used in a large number of studies in political science and closely related fields. In this paper, we extend the work of Lewis and Poole (2004) on the parametric bootstrap to DW-NOMINATE and obtain standard errors for the legislator ideal points. These standard errors are in the range of 1%–4% of the range of DW-NOMINATE coordinates.

Authors' note: We thank the National Science Foundation, Rice University, and the San Diego Supercomputer Center for their support. Replication materials are available on the Political Analysis Web site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.