Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2008
Political Analysis 2009 17(1):1-24; doi:10.1093/pan/mpn009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/1/1    most recent
mpn009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacoby, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States

William G. Jacoby and Saundra K. Schneider

Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, 303 South Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: jacoby{at}msu.edu (corresponding author)

In this paper, we develop and test a general measure of policy expenditures in the American states. Our approach is to construct a spatial proximity model of yearly state program spending. The empirical analysis reveals that state spending patterns vary along a clear and readily-interpretable unidimensional continuum which differentiates policies that provide particularized benefits to needy constituencies from policies that provide broader collective goods. Based upon standard evaluative criteria, the variable created from our model possesses some highly desirable characteristics. And, it compares favorably to other measures of state policy activity. The net result is a yearly score for each state which summarizes that state's spending across all major program areas. More generally, we believe that our variable can be interpreted as valid and reliable representational measurement of state policy priorities. In this capacity, it could occupy an important position within models of state politics.


Author's note: Many colleagues provided useful feedback on earlier versions of this paper. We particularly appreciate the excellent comments and suggestions from Robert Erikson, Richard Fording, Kim Hill, David Lowery, Andrea McAtee, and George Rabinowitz. We would also like to thank Daniel Lewis and William Myers for their assistance with the data collection. The yearly state policy priority scores obtained from the unfolding analysis, along with the data used to create the scores, the SAS macro to carry out the unfolding procedure, and all other supplemental materials are available on the authors’ web sites: http://polisci.msu.edu/jacoby and http://polisci.msu.edu/schneider. All these materials are also available on the Political Analysis Web site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.