Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on May 6, 2008
Political Analysis 2008 16(3):324-344; doi:10.1093/pan/mpn002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/3/324    most recent
mpn002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hood, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, I. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Two Sides of the Same Coin? Employing Granger Causality Tests in a Time Series Cross-Section Framework

M. V. Hood, III

Department of Political Science, 104 Baldwin Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-1615, USA, email: th{at}uga.edu

Quentin Kidd

Department of Government, Christopher Newport University, 1 University Place, Newport News, VA 23606, USA, email: qkidd{at}cnu.edu

Irwin L. Morris

Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland at College Park, 3140 Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA

e-mail: imorris{at}gvpt.umd.edu (corresponding author)

In this paper, we introduce a recently developed methodology for assessing the assumption of causal homogeneity in a time series cross-section Granger framework. Following a description of the procedure and the analytical contexts for which it is appropriate, we implement this new approach to examine the transformation of the post-World War II party system in the South. Specifically, we analyze the causal relationship between black mobilization and GOP growth in the region. We find that black mobilization Granger caused Republican growth throughout the South, whereas Republican growth Granger caused black mobilization only in the deep South. We discuss the substantive significance of our results and conclude with guidelines for the appropriate use of this procedure and suggestions for future extensions of the method.


Authors' note: We would like to thank Christophe Hurlin and Baptiste Venet for their path-breaking work in this area and especially for the helpful comments provided by Professor Hurlin. In addition, we would also like to thank Geoff Layman, Mike Hanmer, and the participants of the American Politics Workshop at the University of Maryland, College Park for their helpful advice. A previous version of the manuscript was presented at the 2006 Citadel Symposium on Southern Politics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.