Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2007
Political Analysis 2008 16(2):179-196; doi:10.1093/pan/mpm023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/179    most recent
mpm023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, G.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Testing the Predictions of the Multidimensional Spatial Voting Model with Roll Call Data

Gyung-Ho Jeong

Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1063, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130

e-mail: gjeong{at}artsci.wustl.edu

This paper develops a procedure for locating proposals and legislators in a multidimensional policy space by applying agenda-constrained ideal point estimation. Placing proposals and legislators on the same scale allows an empirical test of the predictions of the spatial voting model. I illustrate this procedure by testing the predictive power of the uncovered set—a solution concept of the multidimensional spatial voting model—using roll call data from the U.S. Senate. Since empirical tests of the predictive power of the uncovered set have been limited to experimental data, this is the first empirical test of the concept's predictive power using real-world data.


Author's note: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Political Methodology Society. I am grateful to Andrew Martin, Gary Miller, Dan O'Neill, David Park, Robert Walker, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. I am especially indebted to Gary Miller for his insights and advice. All remaining errors are my own.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Econ OrganHome page
G.-H. Jeong, G. J. Miller, and A. C. Sobel
Political Compromise and Bureaucratic Structure: The Political Origins of the Federal Reserve System
J. Law Econ. Organ., October 1, 2009; 25(2): 472 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.