Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2007
Political Analysis 2008 16(2):138-152; doi:10.1093/pan/mpm025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/138    most recent
mpm025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vavreck, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Analysis of Cluster-Randomized Experiments: A Comparison of Alternative Estimation Approaches

Donald P. Green

Yale University, Department of Political Science, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 e-mail: donald.green{at}yale.edu

Lynn Vavreck

UCLA, Department of Political Science, 4289 Bunche Hall Box 951472, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472

e-mail: lvavreck{at}ucla.edu (corresponding author)

Analysts of cluster-randomized field experiments have an array of estimation techniques to choose from. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we evaluate the properties of point estimates and standard errors (SEs) generated by ordinary least squares (OLS) as applied to both individual-level and cluster-level data. We also compare OLS to alternative random effects estimators, such as generalized least squares (GLS). Our simulations assess efficiency across a variety of scenarios involving varying sample sizes and numbers of clusters. Our results confirm that conventional OLS SEs are severely biased downward and that, for all estimators, gains in efficiency come mainly from increasing the number of clusters, not increasing the number of individuals within clusters. We find relatively minor differences across alternative estimation approaches, but GLS seems to enjoy a slight edge in terms of the efficiency of its point estimates and the accuracy of its SEs. We illustrate the application of alternative estimation approaches using a clustered experiment in which Rock the Vote TV advertisements were used to encourage young voters in 85 cable TV markets to vote in the 2004 presidential election.


Authors' note: We thank Rock the Vote for permission to use their public service announcements in this field experiment. The authors are grateful to Alan Gerber for suggestions throughout the design phase of this project. We are also grateful to Dan Kotin and Margaret Coblentz, who worked with cable operators, distributed the advertisements, and assembled the data. We thank Terence Leong for his programming expertise. Replication materials are available on the Political Analysis Web site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
S. C. Andersen and P. B. Mortensen
Policy Stability and Organizational Performance: Is There a Relationship?
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., May 14, 2009; (2009) mup005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
POLIT ANALHome page
K. Arceneaux and D. W. Nickerson
Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods
Political Analysis, April 10, 2009; (2009) mpp004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.