Skip Navigation


Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2007
Political Analysis 2007 15(4):365-386; doi:10.1093/pan/mpm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/365    most recent
mpm007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrera, Y. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kapur, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Improving Data Quality: Actors, Incentives, and Capabilities

Yoshiko M. Herrera

Department of Government, Harvard University, Davis Center, #S301, 1730 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Devesh Kapur

Centre for Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 560, Philadelphia, PA 19104
e-mail: dkapur{at}sas.upenn.edu

e-mail: herrera{at}fas.harvard.edu (corresponding author)

This paper examines the construction and use of data sets in political science. We focus on three interrelated questions: How might we assess data quality? What factors shape data quality? and How can these factors be addressed to improve data quality? We first outline some problems with existing data set quality, including issues of validity, coverage, and accuracy, and we discuss some ways of identifying problems as well as some consequences of data quality problems. The core of the paper addresses the second question by analyzing the incentives and capabilities facing four key actors in a data supply chain: respondents, data collection agencies (including state bureaucracies and private organizations), international organizations, and finally, academic scholars. We conclude by making some suggestions for improving the use and construction of data sets.


Authors' note: For generous comments at many stages in the paper, the authors would like to thank Dawn Brancati, Bear Braumoeller, Kanchan Chandra, Jorge Dominguez, Errol D'Souza, Richard Grossman, Ana Grzymala-Busse, Andrew Kydd, David Laitin, Daniel Posner, Jasjeet Sekhon, Hillel Soifer, Jessica Wallack, and Steven Wilkinson and the Comparative Politics Research Workshop at Harvard University, and the anonymous reviewers from Political Analysis. The authors take full responsibility for any errors. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meetings, Boston, MA, August 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.