Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on June 7, 2006
Political Analysis 2006 14(3):250-267; doi:10.1093/pan/mpj020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence
Department of Government, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
Department of Political Science, Arizona State University, Box 873902, Tempe, AZ 85287-3902
e-mail: bennetta{at}georgetown.edu
e-mail: colin.elman{at}asu.edu (corresponding author)
This article discusses the application of qualitative methods in analyzing causal complexity. In particular, the essay reviews how process tracing and systematic case comparisons can address path-dependent explanations. The article unpacks the concept of path dependence and its component elements of causal possibility, contingency, closure of alternatives, and constraints to the current path. The article then reviews four strengths that case studies bring to the study of path dependence: offering a detailed and holistic analysis of sequences in historical cases, being suitable for the study of rare events, facilitating the search for omitted variables that might lie behind contingent events, and allowing for the study of interaction effects within one or a few cases.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Elmelund-Praestekaer and C. Wien What's the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 247 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mahoney Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 122 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bennett and C. Elman Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 170 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

