Political Analysis Advance Access originally published online on May 11, 2005
Political Analysis 2005 13(3):253-260; doi:10.1093/pan/mpi016
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using Geographic Information Systems to Measure District Change, 20002002
Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, 303 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: crespinm{at}msu.edu
In this article, I use geographic information systems to develop a continuous measure of district continuity and change following the 200002 congressional redistricting cycle. The new measure provides details of where the new population in a district came from and how the old population was distributed within new districts. This measure is then used to demonstrate the independent and interactive influence of district change on competition for congressional elections.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Murphy and A. Yoshinaka Are Mapmakers Able to Target and Protect Congressional Incumbents?: The Institutional Dynamics of Electoral Competition American Politics Research, November 1, 2009; 37(6): 955 - 982. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Carson, M. H. Crespin, C. J. Finocchiaro, and D. W. Rohde Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives American Politics Research, November 1, 2007; 35(6): 878 - 904. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
