Political Analysis, 11:1
© 2003 by the Society for Political Methodology
Using Ecological Inference Point Estimates as Dependent Variables in Second-Stage Linear Regressions
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Scott Hall, 601 University Place, Evanston, IL 60208-1006 e-mail: m-herron{at}northwestern.edu e-mail: k-shotts{at}northwestern.edu
The practice of using point estimates produced by the King ecological inference technique as dependent variables in second-stage linear regressions leads to second-stage results that, in general, are inconsistent. This conclusion holds even when all assumptions behind King's ecological technique are satisfied. Second-stage inconsistency is a consequence of the fact that King-based point estimates of disaggregated quantities contain errors correlated with the true quantities the estimates measure. Our findings on second-stage inconsistency, as well as a fix that we propose, follow from econometric theory in conjunction with an analysis of simulated and real ecological data sets.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Elff, T. Gschwend, and R. J. Johnston Ignoramus, Ignorabimus? On Uncertainty in Ecological Inference Political Analysis, February 14, 2008; (2008) mpm030v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Lewis and D. A. Linzer Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates Political Analysis, October 1, 2005; 13(4): 345 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
